Skip to content

How do I implement a clinical audit in my practice?

A practical audit cycle for a private GP service: choosing a topic, setting standards, collecting data, making changes and re-auditing, with example topics.

The short answer

Pick a topic that matters for patient safety or quality in your service, set measurable standards from guidance such as NICE, collect data from your records, compare it with the standards, make changes and then re-audit to check they worked. The cycle is only complete once you have re-measured. A well-run audit gives you evidence for CQC’s well-led and effective questions and a quality improvement activity for your appraisal.

Key points

  • Clinical audit measures care against agreed standards, acts on the gaps and re-measures. Without the re-audit it is only a snapshot.
  • Choose topics with real risk or frequent activity in your service, such as high-risk prescribing, results handling or letters to NHS GPs.
  • Take standards from NICE, the BNF, national safety indicators or your own policies, and write them as measurable targets.
  • Coded records and searchable registers make data collection much faster than reading notes.
  • The CQC expects providers to audit their services, and GP appraisal expects quality improvement activity that covers your whole scope of practice, including private work.
  • In Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland the regulations for independent clinics also require you to review the quality of your service, and audit is the obvious way to show it.

Why audit matters in private practice

Clinical audit is a quality improvement cycle. You measure care against agreed standards, take action to close the gaps, and measure again. That is how the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP) describes it in its best practice guidance.

In private general practice there are three practical reasons to do it:

  • The CQC. In England, regulation 17 requires CQC-registered providers to assess, monitor and improve the quality and safety of their services. The CQC’s guidance on the regulation refers specifically to regular audits.
  • Appraisal and revalidation. The RCGP says GPs are expected to take part in quality improvement activity that relates to their practice at least once in each five-year revalidation cycle, and appraisal should cover your whole scope of practice. Your private work counts.
  • Safety. Without a practice team around you, audit is one of the few ways to find out whether what you think happens is what actually happens.

The audit cycle, step by step

  1. Choose a topic. Pick something where the risk is high, the activity is frequent, or you already suspect a problem. Keep the question narrow enough to answer.
  2. Set the standard. Write one to three criteria, each with a target. For example: “100% of patients prescribed methotrexate have blood monitoring recorded within the interval recommended in the BNF.” Say where each standard comes from.
  3. Decide the sample. Define who is included, the time period and how many records. For a small service, all eligible patients over six or twelve months is often manageable.
  4. Collect the data. Run a search if your record system allows it, or use a simple data collection form. Record exceptions and the reasons for them.
  5. Compare with the standard. Work out the percentage meeting each criterion and look at the cases that did not, because the reasons tell you what to change.
  6. Agree and make changes. Change the system, not just your resolve. Examples are a template, a recall, a checklist, a new step in a protocol or training for staff.
  7. Re-audit. Repeat the same measurement after the changes have had time to work, often three to six months later. If the target still is not met, go round again.
  8. Write it up. A one-page summary is enough: topic, standards, results of both rounds, changes made and next steps. Keep it for your appraisal portfolio and CQC evidence.

Topics that suit a private GP service

TopicExample standardSource of the standard
Monitoring of high-risk medicinesMonitoring up to date before each further supplyBNF, product licence, shared care protocols
Antibiotic prescribing for sore throat or respiratory infectionPrescribing in line with NICE guidance, with the decision tool score recordedNICE antimicrobial prescribing guidelines
Letters to NHS GPsLetter sent within an agreed number of working days when diagnosis or medicines change, or refusal of consent recordedYour own policy, GMC guidance on sharing information
Test resultsEvery result reviewed, actioned and communicated to the patient within an agreed timeYour results policy
Remote consultationsIdentity check and safeguarding questions recorded before prescribingYour remote consulting policy, GMC remote prescribing guidance
HRT reviewsAnnual review documented, including risks and benefits discussedNICE menopause guidance
Minor surgeryHistology sent and result acted on for every excision, and consent recordedYour minor surgery protocol

Nationally developed prescribing safety indicators, such as those from the PINCER programme, give ready-made criteria for hazardous prescribing and monitoring. Researchers have promoted them as an audit tool for general practice.

Getting the data

The quality of your records decides how easy audit is. If diagnoses, medicines and tests are coded, for example in SNOMED CT, you can search for every eligible patient in minutes. Free-text notes mean reading each record by hand, and you will miss people. When choosing or reviewing a record system, check whether you can search by code, date and medicine, export results and save searches to re-run. See how to choose a record system.

Clinical audit of your own service’s records by your own clinical team is part of running the service. Anonymise the data before sharing results outside the team, for example with an appraiser.

Common pitfalls

  • No re-audit. A single round of data collection is not a completed audit.
  • Vague standards. “Good documentation” cannot be measured. “Allergy status recorded” can.
  • Too big. Twenty criteria across a thousand records will not get finished.
  • Blaming individuals. Findings should lead to changes in systems.
  • Confusing audit with research. Audit measures against existing standards and does not go to a research ethics committee, although ethical and data protection principles still apply. If you are testing something new or allocating patients to different care, it may be research. HQIP publishes a guide to telling them apart.

In Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland

Regulation 17 and the CQC apply in England only. The audit cycle above works in every nation, but the legal hook is different:

  • Wales: Healthcare Inspectorate Wales (HIW) inspects independent clinics against the Independent Health Care (Wales) Regulations 2011 and the National Minimum Standards for Independent Health Care Services in Wales. Regulation 19 requires systems to regularly assess and monitor the quality of your service, and to make changes in response to incident analysis and the conclusions of clinical audits. HIW can ask for a written annual return on how you do this, due within 28 days of the request. Standard 6 of the national minimum standards covers taking part in quality improvement activities, and it gives clinical audit as an example.
  • Scotland: Healthcare Improvement Scotland (HIS) regulates independent clinics, including private GP services. Under regulation 13 of the Healthcare Improvement Scotland (Requirements as to Independent Health Care Services) Regulations 2011, you must make sure your care is of an appropriate quality, review it with input from service users, and record the review in writing for HIS and service users.
  • Northern Ireland: RQIA registers and inspects independent clinics. Regulation 17 of the Independent Health Care Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2005 requires a system for reviewing the quality of treatment at appropriate intervals, a report of each review sent to RQIA and made available to patients, and arrangements for learning from adverse incidents. RQIA’s provider guidance for private doctor services lists routine audits, including clinical audits, with actions put into practice, as examples of evidence.

Appraisal and revalidation are run by the GMC across the UK, so the quality improvement expectation for your appraisal is the same wherever you work. Check your own regulator’s current guidance for any reporting it expects.

Where audit fits

Audit is one part of clinical governance, alongside significant event review, complaints, patient feedback and training. See what is clinical governance? For ideas on what to audit first, the risk areas in preventing clinical errors are a good place to start.

Tools that can help

Frequently asked questions

How many audits should a private GP do each year?

There is no fixed number. Agree what is proportionate with your appraiser, but one completed cycle a year that covers a meaningful part of your private work is a reasonable aim.

Can a solo GP audit their own practice?

Yes. Most audit is self-assessment against standards. Discuss the results with a peer or your appraiser to add an outside view.

Do I need patient consent to audit records?

Not usually, when your own clinical team audits your own service’s records. Anonymise data before sharing it outside the team.

Will the CQC ask to see my audits?

It may. Audits with completed cycles and documented changes are good evidence that the service is effective and well-led.

Do I need to audit if my service is in Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland?

Yes, in effect. The regulations for independent clinics in each nation require you to monitor or review the quality of your service, and HIW, Healthcare Improvement Scotland and RQIA all look at how you do it. Completed audit cycles are good evidence for any of them.

Sources

  1. Best Practice in Clinical AuditHealthcare Quality Improvement Partnership · hqip.org.uk · Accessed
  2. A Guide for Clinical Audit, Research and Service ReviewHealthcare Quality Improvement Partnership · hqip.org.uk · Accessed
  3. Revalidation regulations and requirementsRoyal College of General Practitioners · rcgp.org.uk · Accessed
  4. Regulation 17: Good governanceCare Quality Commission · cqc.org.uk · Accessed
  5. Examining variations in prescribing safety in UK general practiceBMJ, via PubMed Central · ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · Accessed
  6. The Independent Health Care (Wales) Regulations 2011legislation.gov.uk · legislation.gov.uk · Accessed
  7. National Minimum Standards for Independent Health Care Services in WalesWelsh Government · gov.wales · Accessed
  8. Independent hospitals, clinics and medical agenciesHealthcare Inspectorate Wales · hiw.org.uk · Accessed
  9. Healthcare Improvement Scotland (Requirements as to Independent Health Care Services) Regulations 2011, regulation 13legislation.gov.uk · legislation.gov.uk · Accessed
  10. Information for service providers: independent clinicsHealthcare Improvement Scotland · healthcareimprovementscotland.scot · Accessed
  11. Independent Health Care Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2005, regulation 17legislation.gov.uk · legislation.gov.uk · Accessed
  12. Independent clinic: private doctor service provider guidanceRegulation and Quality Improvement Authority · rqia.org.uk · Accessed